Archive for the ‘Human rights’ Category

Is Obama’s Darfur Promise Broken?

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

obama_lg

Do you think that President Obama has kept his campaign promise about the genocide in Darfur? Many Darfur advocates do not. Please read the reasons below and decide for yourself. For daily updates on the news from Darfur from the viewpoint of those who live there, visit http://whilewewaitsudan.blogspot.com

If you agree that Obama has broken his promise, send an email to the “Obameter” at obameter@politifact.com and tell the editors why you believe Obama has broken Promise #430.

If we can tilt the Obameter to count immediate action on Darfur as one of Obama’s broken promises, we just might get his long overdue attention.

President Obama’s Promise on Darfur

“As president, Obama will take immediate steps to end the genocide in Darfur by increasing pressure on the Sudanese and pressure the government to halt the killing and stop impeding the deployment of a robust international force.”

Source – The Change We Need – Foreign Policy

Has Obama’s promise been broken? You decide.

FACT: Over four months after inauguration, Government of Sudan (GoS) planes have been bombing defenseless Darfuri refugees in camps in Chad and its own citizens in IDP camps in Darfur.

OBAMA’S RESPONSE: None

FACT: Nearly three months after the GoS expelled 13 foreign aid groups from the country, 1.5 million people are still waiting for adequate food, water, sanitation and medical care to be restored. The GoS has repeatedly refused to permit these humanitarian aid organizations to return, instead claiming to provide aid itself. This claim is disputed by Darfuris and the expelled organizations.

OBAMA’S RESPONSE: On March 10, Obama said it is “not acceptable to put that many people’s lives at risk” and “We need to be able to get those humanitarian organizations back on the ground.” No further response since then.

FACT: Four months after inauguration, the US State Department, has yet to unveil its long-awaited Sudan policy review.

OBAMA’S RESPONSE: Since the State Department answers to the White House, the slow pace of this review is a direct contradiction of his promise for “immediate” steps.

FACT: Retired Maj. General Scott Gration, the President’s Special Envoy to Sudan, spoke of the need to “look, learn and listen” from the regime of indicted war criminal President Omar al-Bashir and has extended the hand of America in friendship.

OBAMA’S RESPONSE: Under Obama, the new administration has not made any comments regarding “increasing pressure” on the GoS.

FACT: Three months after inauguration, the State Department released a report which, according to Senator Russ Feingold, D-Wisc., overstates Sudan’s cooperation with the United States on counterterrorism. Feingold has asked for a response from the State Department.

OBAMA’S RESPONSE: None

FACT: Efforts to convene a civil society conference on Darfur with the aim of building what its organizers call “a mandate for peace” were derailed by the GoS.

OBAMA’S RESPONSE: None

FACT: The GoS executed 9 men on April 1, who may have been innocent of the crimes for which they were convicted. Over 70 more men await a similar fate. Their confessions were reported to have been extracted under torture.

OBAMA’S RESPONSE: None

The facts speak for themselves. If you agree that President Obama has broken his promise, send an email to the “Obameter” at obameter@politifact.com and tell the editors why Obama has broken Promise #430. It’s not too late to get the President to live up to his word.

For daily updates on the news from Darfur from the viewpoint of those who live there, visit http://whilewewaitsudan.blogspot.com

AP: Vanguard continues to invest in PetroChina (NYSE: PTR)

Saturday, May 9th, 2009

In spite of a human rights screening policy, Vanguard continues to invest in oil companies that help to fund the ongoing genocide in Darfur Sudan, according to a recent Associated Press column on mutual funds.

In contrast, a shareholder proposal now being voted on by Vanguard customers would “go further than the company’s screening policy, requiring Vanguard to ‘institute procedures to prevent holding investments in companies that, in the judgment of the board, substantially contribute to genocide or crimes against humanity,’” says the article.

Vanguard claims that its policy and the one proposed by the shareholder proposal are “substantially identical.” To me, they seem “substantially different.” That’s why, as a Vanguard customer, I voted “yes” on Question 3 on my proxy ballot.

Read more about the vote at Vanguard and how you can help promote genocide-free investing at the Investors Against Genocide website.

Will Obama Act to End Darfur Tragedy? – Op-ed in Baltimore Sun

Friday, February 6th, 2009

In the coming days, President Barack Obama will be presented with an opportunity to tackle a foreign policy challenge frequently raised on the campaign trail: the human rights crisis in Darfur.

Since 2003, the Sudanese government and its militia allies have killed and displaced hundreds of thousands of Darfur’s civilians. The government has also obstructed international efforts to stop the killing. As a consequence, the U.N. Security Council authorized the International Criminal Court to address this matter. The ICC is expected to issue an arrest warrant for Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir on war crimes charges within the next week or two.

Such action would make Mr. al-Bashir the first sitting head of state to be subjected to an arrest warrant in the court’s history. The challenge for the Obama administration is to leverage the pressure the court’s action will bring to bear on the Sudanese leader. Mr. Obama should publicly support the arrest warrant and make clear that the U.S. will not sit idly by if any member of the Security Council – notably China – attempts to shield Mr. al-Bashir.

Read more